I help EU mid-market sites pursue and maintain European Accessibility Act (EAA) conformance. Three products, scope-based pricing, a fixed quote in writing before you sign.
Recommendations come from what I've built, not what I've read.
— Joe, EAA Accessibility Consultant · Leiden, NL
Book a free 15-minute call Take the 5-minute scorecard
Reference: 123 accessibility terms — WCAG criteria, audit data, remediation patterns.
Free tool
Enter your website address and the scanner automatically checks your pages against the main accessibility standards — WCAG 2.2 and EN 301 549 — then gives you a quick list of the issues it finds. It runs the same automated check I start a full audit with. Automated tools can't catch everything, though: things like screen-reader testing and color-contrast review still need a person. So use this as a first look, and book the audit when you want the full picture.
The European Accessibility Act has been enforceable since 28 June 2025. Member states have designated competent authorities and published penalty frameworks; the regulatory layer is no longer theoretical.
Arcom monitors the accessibility of digital services in France — websites, apps, and intranets — and verifies conformance against the RGAA (France's national accessibility standard) through sworn agents. It can issue formal notices and impose financial penalties of up to €50,000. Arcom — digital accessibility →
The Barrierefreiheitsstärkungsgesetz entered into force on 28 June 2025. Its penalty provision, § 37 BFSG, sets administrative fines of up to €100,000 for the most serious violations and up to €10,000 for the rest. § 37 BFSG →
The Netherlands transposed the EAA via the Implementatiewet toegankelijkheidsvoorschriften producten en diensten. A published accessibility statement is required for every in-scope digital service. Monitoring framework →
Each product is scope-priced with a fixed quote in writing before sign. No billable-hour surprises. Pick the one that matches where you are.
Typical audit €3,500–€7,500 Typically 2 weeks · scoped per engagement
Best for: You haven't been audited, or you have but want a second look.
Conformance to EN 301 549 — the EU's technical accessibility standard — verified within tested scope. Paste-ready remediation guidance, each finding tied to a specific WCAG 2.2 success criterion (the international Web Content Accessibility Guidelines). Accessibility statement drafted, ready to publish on delivery.
Typical sprint €6,000–€14,000 Typically 4 weeks · scoped per engagement
Best for: You have an audit. You have a backlog. You need it shipped before a date.
Fixes shipped pull-request by pull-request (PR) against your code repository, or paste-ready patches if I don't have repository access. WCAG 2.2 success-criterion reference per commit. Updated accessibility statement on delivery. Scope and price defined by the underlying audit findings.
€1,800 / month 6-month minimum · cancellable monthly after
Best for: You ship continuously and can't pause for a full audit every quarter.
Monthly review of new content and releases. A quarterly conformance snapshot — audit-shaped, regulator-ready — for your supervisory file. On-call advisor for accessibility questions, priority response in 12–24 hours, direct Slack or Teams access. Ad-hoc remediation bills at the Sprint rate.
Audit-specific. Remediation and training scopes vary per engagement and are described per-product above.
Three sites I've audited — mine